Skip to main content

Once Upon a Time I Lived on Mars - Kate Greene ****

The easily-overlooked key words in the title of this book are 'Once Upon a Time'.  Because Kate Greene's memoir is doubly redolent of that fairytale opening that puts us in a world that is somewhat removed from reality. First, her book is concerned not (of course) with actually living on Mars, but spending four months in an environment that partially simulated what it would be like to be on Mars (but was actually on Hawaii). And secondly, although there is quite a lot about what happened on that experiment, this is not so much a book about exploring outer space as inner space: it's far more a narrative of how Greene feels the experience affected her than it is a conventional narrative.

What it reminded me most of was something that seems (literally) worlds away from a space mission: Down in the Valley, the posthumous set of recollections by Laurie Lee of his early life in Slad, a Cotswolds village, in the 1920s. Lee's book (taken from recordings) is about life in an isolated location, and gives us scraps and reminiscences, rather than a structured memoir - and, similarly, Greene does not give us the linear story of life in the HI-SEAS mission, where six pseudo-astronauts lived in close proximity and isolation, but rather snippets that dart around in time, driven more by themes and feelings, and incorporating a considerable amount of material about Greene's family life outside of the experiment.

Along the way we hear more about the importance of food on the 'expedition' (one of the main themes of the experiment), boredom, what makes an astronaut, being a guinea pig, isolation and the effect of being on the mission on her subjective experience of time. Greene shows us how much the four months changed her - not always necessarily for the better. In parts it's quite raw: this is mostly not a book about the science and NASA (though both feature). However, if you are interest in insights into what it is to be human it's a fascinating and sometimes moving account. There are several parallels drawn in the text with Shackleton's disastrous Endurance Antarctic expedition - in one sense, HI-SEAS had none of the peril, but certainly plenty of the impact of close confines, isolation and boredom.

At times, the author's introduction of philosophical material can feel to be verging on the pretentious. We get, for example, Roland Barthes' comment on the Apollo 'Earthrise' image 'The photograph is violent: not because it shows violent things, but because on each occasion it fills the sight by force, and because in it nothing can be refused and transformed.' which makes me more inclined to snigger than be impressed by its depth. I felt Greene was also a bit heavy on SpaceX, taking a negative view on the use of a Tesla Roadster as a dummy payload for their Falcon Heavy test - of course it was a publicity stunt, but it was brilliant and far better than just putting up a lump of bland metal. (The book also incorrectly suggests the Roadster is orbiting the Earth - it's actually orbiting the Sun in an orbit that crosses the orbit of Mars, which is much more interesting.)

There's a lot packed into Once Upon a Time I Lived on Mars. Come to it with an open mind, and a strong awareness of how much the gaze is inward, not looking out to the red planet, and it should be a truly interesting experience.

Hardback:

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here.  We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more