Niall Deacon - Four Way Interview

Niall Deacon is an astronomy researcher and writer, and lives in Heidelberg, Germany. His research focuses on failed stars called brown dwarfs and giant planets orbiting other stars. His first book Twenty Worlds tells the story of planets around other stars.

Why science?

I’ve always been someone who loves finding things out. When I was a kid I used to love reading non-fiction books, atlases, books about flags or football stadia etc. I’ve just transferred that to working in science because science is a collection of ways of working things out. There’s just something really exciting about rolling up your sleeves and trying to interpret a dataset, trying to find out what it says about the Universe.

Why this book?

There were a few themes that came together writing this book. The first was that I wanted to write something that covered as wide a range of exoplanet science as possible. I’ve spent years sitting in seminars and conferences listening to talks about lots of amazing science. I wanted to try to tell the story of as much of that science as I could rather than focusing on one particular aspect of exoplanet science. The second was that I wanted to lay out how scientists have found out so much about exoplanets in such a short time. I wanted to talk the reader through as many of the physical processes and observing techniques as possible, using examples a typical interested reader could relate to.

What's next?

For me, I’m currently working at the IAU’s Office of Astronomy for Education and we are working to build a global network to support astronomy education. I don’t know if I will write another book. It was amazing to write one book, I’ll have to see if I get another opportunity.

For exoplanets I think we are in a very interesting period of time. We are a few weeks away from the 25th anniversary of the discovery of the first planet found around another star similar to the Sun. Since then we’ve found thousands more exoplanets. In the next decade we’re going to get huge facilities such as the James Webb Space Telescope, extremely large ground-based telescopes and even space missions dedicated to studying exoplanet atmospheres. This avalanche of data is going to help us learn a lot more about the characteristics of exoplanets, their atmospheres, their compositions etc.

What's exciting you at the moment?

Well I’m sitting here typing two days after the announcement of possible biosignatures in Venus’s upper atmosphere, so that’s exciting. Even if there is no life there, there must be a very interesting chemical process waiting to be revealed. Other than that, I support a football team whose unofficial motto is 'Expect the Unexpected'. That’s how I view astronomy in the future, I’m looking forward to being excited by amazing discoveries that I (and most other scientists) had never even considered.

Comments

The Antigravity Enigma - Andrew May ****

Antigravity - the ability to overcome the pull of gravity - has been a fantasy for thousands of years and subject to more scientific (if impractical) fictional representation since H. G. Wells came up with cavorite in The First Men in the Moon . But is it plausible scientifically? Andrew May does a good job of pulling together three ways of looking at our love affair with antigravity (and the related concept of cancelling inertia) - in science fiction, in physics and in pseudoscience and crankery. As May points out, science fiction is an important starting point as the concept was deployed there well before we had a good enough understanding of gravity to make any sensible scientific stabs at the idea (even though, for instance, Michael Faraday did unsuccessfully experiment with a possible interaction between gravity and electromagnetism). We then get onto the science itself, noting the potential impact on any ideas of antigravity that come from the move from a Newtonian view of a...

The World as We Know It - Peter Dear ***

History professor Peter Dear gives us a detailed and reasoned coverage of the development of science as a concept from its origins as natural philosophy, covering the years from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. inclusive If that sounds a little dry, frankly, it is. But if you don't mind a very academic approach, it is certainly interesting. Obviously a major theme running through is the move from largely gentleman natural philosophers (with both implications of that word 'gentleman') to professional academic scientists. What started with clubs for relatively well off men with an interest, when universities did not stray far beyond what was included in mathematics (astronomy, for instance), would become a very different beast. The main scientific subjects that Dear covers are physics and biology - we get, for instance, a lot on the gradual move away from a purely mechanical views of physics - the reason Newton's 'action at a distance' gravity caused such ...

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

Search This Blog