Skip to main content

Niall Deacon - Four Way Interview

Niall Deacon is an astronomy researcher and writer, and lives in Heidelberg, Germany. His research focuses on failed stars called brown dwarfs and giant planets orbiting other stars. His first book Twenty Worlds tells the story of planets around other stars.


Why science?

I’ve always been someone who loves finding things out. When I was a kid I used to love reading non-fiction books, atlases, books about flags or football stadia etc. I’ve just transferred that to working in science because science is a collection of ways of working things out. There’s just something really exciting about rolling up your sleeves and trying to interpret a dataset, trying to find out what it says about the Universe.

Why this book?

There were a few themes that came together writing this book. The first was that I wanted to write something that covered as wide a range of exoplanet science as possible. I’ve spent years sitting in seminars and conferences listening to talks about lots of amazing science. I wanted to try to tell the story of as much of that science as I could rather than focusing on one particular aspect of exoplanet science. The second was that I wanted to lay out how scientists have found out so much about exoplanets in such a short time. I wanted to talk the reader through as many of the physical processes and observing techniques as possible, using examples a typical interested reader could relate to. 

What's next?

For me, I’m currently working at the IAU’s Office of Astronomy for Education and we are working to build a global network to support astronomy education. I don’t know if I will write another book. It was amazing to write one book, I’ll have to see if I get another opportunity. 

For exoplanets I think we are in a very interesting period of time. We are a few weeks away from the 25th anniversary of the discovery of the first planet found around another star similar to the Sun. Since then we’ve found thousands more exoplanets. In the next decade we’re going to get huge facilities such as the James Webb Space Telescope, extremely large ground-based telescopes and even space missions dedicated to studying exoplanet atmospheres. This avalanche of data is going to help us learn a lot more about the characteristics of exoplanets, their atmospheres, their compositions etc.

What's exciting you at the moment?

Well I’m sitting here typing two days after the announcement of possible biosignatures in Venus’s upper atmosphere, so that’s exciting. Even if there is no life there, there must be a very interesting chemical process waiting to be revealed. Other than that, I support a football team whose unofficial motto is 'Expect the Unexpected'. That’s how I view astronomy in the future, I’m looking forward to being excited by amazing discoveries that I (and most other scientists) had never even considered.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinity Machine - Sebastian Mallaby ****

It's very quickly clear that Sebastian Mallaby is a huge Demis Hassabis fan - writing about the only child prodigy and teen genius ever who was also a nice, rounded personality. After a few chapters, though, things settle down (I'm reminded of Douglas Adams' description of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ) and we get a good, solid trip through the journey that gave us DeepMind, their AlphaGo and AlphaFold programs, the sudden explosion of competition on the AI front and thoughts on artificial general intelligence. Although Mallaby does occasionally still go into fan mode - reading this you would think that AlphaFold had successfully perfectly predicted the structure of every protein, where it is usually not sufficiently accurate for its results to have direct practical application - we get a real feel for the way this relatively unusual company was swiftly and successfully developed away from Silicon Valley. It's readable and gives an important understanding of...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...