Niall Deacon - Four Way Interview

Niall Deacon is an astronomy researcher and writer, and lives in Heidelberg, Germany. His research focuses on failed stars called brown dwarfs and giant planets orbiting other stars. His first book Twenty Worlds tells the story of planets around other stars.

Why science?

I’ve always been someone who loves finding things out. When I was a kid I used to love reading non-fiction books, atlases, books about flags or football stadia etc. I’ve just transferred that to working in science because science is a collection of ways of working things out. There’s just something really exciting about rolling up your sleeves and trying to interpret a dataset, trying to find out what it says about the Universe.

Why this book?

There were a few themes that came together writing this book. The first was that I wanted to write something that covered as wide a range of exoplanet science as possible. I’ve spent years sitting in seminars and conferences listening to talks about lots of amazing science. I wanted to try to tell the story of as much of that science as I could rather than focusing on one particular aspect of exoplanet science. The second was that I wanted to lay out how scientists have found out so much about exoplanets in such a short time. I wanted to talk the reader through as many of the physical processes and observing techniques as possible, using examples a typical interested reader could relate to.

What's next?

For me, I’m currently working at the IAU’s Office of Astronomy for Education and we are working to build a global network to support astronomy education. I don’t know if I will write another book. It was amazing to write one book, I’ll have to see if I get another opportunity.

For exoplanets I think we are in a very interesting period of time. We are a few weeks away from the 25th anniversary of the discovery of the first planet found around another star similar to the Sun. Since then we’ve found thousands more exoplanets. In the next decade we’re going to get huge facilities such as the James Webb Space Telescope, extremely large ground-based telescopes and even space missions dedicated to studying exoplanet atmospheres. This avalanche of data is going to help us learn a lot more about the characteristics of exoplanets, their atmospheres, their compositions etc.

What's exciting you at the moment?

Well I’m sitting here typing two days after the announcement of possible biosignatures in Venus’s upper atmosphere, so that’s exciting. Even if there is no life there, there must be a very interesting chemical process waiting to be revealed. Other than that, I support a football team whose unofficial motto is 'Expect the Unexpected'. That’s how I view astronomy in the future, I’m looking forward to being excited by amazing discoveries that I (and most other scientists) had never even considered.

Comments

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied), the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re

Search This Blog