Niall Deacon - Four Way Interview

Niall Deacon is an astronomy researcher and writer, and lives in Heidelberg, Germany. His research focuses on failed stars called brown dwarfs and giant planets orbiting other stars. His first book Twenty Worlds tells the story of planets around other stars.

Why science?

I’ve always been someone who loves finding things out. When I was a kid I used to love reading non-fiction books, atlases, books about flags or football stadia etc. I’ve just transferred that to working in science because science is a collection of ways of working things out. There’s just something really exciting about rolling up your sleeves and trying to interpret a dataset, trying to find out what it says about the Universe.

Why this book?

There were a few themes that came together writing this book. The first was that I wanted to write something that covered as wide a range of exoplanet science as possible. I’ve spent years sitting in seminars and conferences listening to talks about lots of amazing science. I wanted to try to tell the story of as much of that science as I could rather than focusing on one particular aspect of exoplanet science. The second was that I wanted to lay out how scientists have found out so much about exoplanets in such a short time. I wanted to talk the reader through as many of the physical processes and observing techniques as possible, using examples a typical interested reader could relate to.

What's next?

For me, I’m currently working at the IAU’s Office of Astronomy for Education and we are working to build a global network to support astronomy education. I don’t know if I will write another book. It was amazing to write one book, I’ll have to see if I get another opportunity.

For exoplanets I think we are in a very interesting period of time. We are a few weeks away from the 25th anniversary of the discovery of the first planet found around another star similar to the Sun. Since then we’ve found thousands more exoplanets. In the next decade we’re going to get huge facilities such as the James Webb Space Telescope, extremely large ground-based telescopes and even space missions dedicated to studying exoplanet atmospheres. This avalanche of data is going to help us learn a lot more about the characteristics of exoplanets, their atmospheres, their compositions etc.

What's exciting you at the moment?

Well I’m sitting here typing two days after the announcement of possible biosignatures in Venus’s upper atmosphere, so that’s exciting. Even if there is no life there, there must be a very interesting chemical process waiting to be revealed. Other than that, I support a football team whose unofficial motto is 'Expect the Unexpected'. That’s how I view astronomy in the future, I’m looking forward to being excited by amazing discoveries that I (and most other scientists) had never even considered.

Comments

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader. We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard. This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...

The AI Paradox - Virginia Dignum ****

This is a really important book in the way that Virginia Dignum highlights various ways we can misunderstand AI and its abilities using a series of paradoxes. However, I need to say up front that I'm giving it four stars for the ideas: unfortunately the writing is not great. It reads more like a government report than anything vaguely readable - it really should have co-authored with a professional writer to make it accessible. Even so, I'm recommending it: like some government reports it's significant enough to make it necessary to wade through the bureaucrat speak. Why paradoxes? Dignum identifies two ways we can think about paradoxes (oddly I wrote about paradoxes recently , but with three definitions): a logical paradox such as 'this statement is false', or a paradoxical truth such as 'less is more' - the second of which seems a better to fit to the use here. We are then presented with eight paradoxes, each of which gives some insights into aspects of t...

Search This Blog