Skip to main content

Infinity in the Palm of your Hand - Marcus Chown *****

A new Marcus Chown book is always a treat - and this is like a box of chocolates: a collection of bite-sized delights as Chown presents us with 50 science facts that are strange and wonderful.

The title is a quote from William Blake's Auguries of Innocence: 'To see a World in a Grain of Sand, / And a Heaven in a Wild Flower, / Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand, / And Eternity in an hour.' It would seem particularly appropriate if this book were read on a mobile phone (so it would be literally in the palm), which could well be true for ebook users, as the short essays make excellent reading for a commute, or at bedtime. I found them distinctly moreish - making it difficult to put the book down as I read just one more. And perhaps another. Oh, and that next one looks really interesting...

Each of the 50 pieces has a title and a short introductory heading, which mostly give a feel for the topic. The very first of these, however, briefly baffled me: 'You are a third mushroom.' I imagined a line-up of three mushrooms, of which I was the third. What it really means is 'You are one third mushroom' - about 1/3 of your DNA is shared with a mushroom. We then jump to 'Slime moulds have thirteen sexes' (boggle) and 'Babies are powered by rocket fuel.' (Really.) And that's just the first few in the 'biological things' section. 

Some of the factoids that Chown builds his pieces around are genuinely surprising. 'The body in the solar system that generates the most heat, pound for pound is not the Sun,' for instance. Others may be more familiar, but are still brilliant, such as 'Every breath you take contains an atom breathed out by Marilyn Monroe.' Chown is an astrophysicist by background, so there are a lot of items on space and cosmology. Some of these are perhaps weaker than most because they have a less direct connection to people, like 'Believe it or not we may all be living in a giant hologram.' Meh - no, we're not, it's just over-application of maths to reality. But others do still have the ability to surprise - for example, 'Everyone thinks that gravity sucks, but in most of the universe it blows.'

Of course, these little tweetable nuggets are not all there is to the book, fun though they are. For each of these tiny summaries we get a few pages of exploration and this is where Chown shows just what a good writer he is. Despite having a relatively short amount of text, he makes each essay a little narrative that informs and entertains. Their engaging nature makes it difficult to restrain yourself from sharing your new knowledge with anyone nearby.

If you're pedantic (like me), one slight issue arises. Although the overall points made are fine, in the detail Chown can prioritise keeping the storytelling simple over accuracy. For example, from the first few items: evolutionary theory recognising that organisms on Earth have common ancestors predates Charles Darwin. Hydrogen/oxygen isn't, as we're told, the fuel that 'pound for pound packs the biggest oomph' (think nuclear or antimatter). And there aren't 'around a billion ATP molecules in your body.' The best estimate for these energy storing molecules in an adult is a minimum of 0.1 moles - over 6,000 billion billion. Oh, and you can extract nutrients from your food without bacteria in your stomach (guinea pigs have been bred that do this) - though they're sickly and the process is far less efficient.

This isn't a major problem. The point of a book like this is to inspire the reader to find out more and to give a snappy story that captures the reader's interest. Chown does this brilliantly - there may not be room here to go into the kind of depth required to get a more accurate picture, but hopefully some readers will go on to do so.

The bitesized approach makes this an ideal book for those who might not normally consider reading about science, making a great present for a teenager or adult. Excellent stuff.

Hardback:  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re

Deep Utopia - Nick Bostrom ***

This is one of the strangest sort-of popular science (or philosophy, or something or other) books I've ever read. If you can picture the impact of a cross between Douglas Hofstadter's  Gödel Escher Bach and Gaileo's Two New Sciences  (at least, its conversational structure), then thrown in a touch of David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest , and you can get a feel for what the experience of reading it is like - bewildering with the feeling that there is something deep that you can never quite extract from it. Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom is probably best known in popular science for his book Superintelligence in which he looked at the implications of having artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond human capabilities. In a sense, Deep Utopia is a sequel, picking out one aspect of this speculation: what life would be like for us if technology had solved all our existential problems, while (in the form of superintelligence) it had also taken away much of our appare