Skip to main content

The Most Powerful Idea in the World – William Rosen ****

Histories of the industrial revolution are ten-a-penny, and often rather dull. What William Rosen neatly does with his book, subtitled ‘a story of steam, industry and invention’ is manage to make this hugely important topic – this is, after all, the story of the formation of the modern world – fresh and interesting.
I don’t know if it’s because the author is American that the book seemed particularly fresh – having that slight distance from a story that is mostly about Britain gives it an edge, and his inclusion of US context, which might well be missing from a UK version of this story, was valuable.
Of course we’ve got all the familiar characters here – Watt, Arkwright , Trevithick, Stephenson and the rest – but there is so much more. Rosen takes us on a journey (with plenty of side excursions) through the entire development of industrialization and leading to the crowning moment of the Rocket’s performance at the Rainhill Trials. What helps keep it interesting is the way that Rosen mixes details about the technology, the people and the nature of invention and innovation – so you’ll find lots of information on patent law (more interesting than it sounds) alongside the steam valves and thermodynamics. It really makes you think about the approach that should be taken to intellectual property.
Two of my grandparents worked in a cotton mill in Lancashire that was a direct descendent of the mills that are central to Rosen’s story, so I found this particularly interesting on a personal level, but you don’t have to have that connection to feel the importance of this story. It is about the transformation of a rural economy into an industrial one for the first time in history – a transformation that would be followed by the rest of the world. Just occasionally Rosen can be a little flowery in his language, or a little nerdy in his enthusiasm for some aspect of steam engine technology – but this is rare, and can be overlooked because of the quality of the book as a whole.
One of the things that makes this book so enjoyable is the detail of the research – the author clearly really likes diving into obscure detail, then bringing it out in a way that intrigues. I wish he hadn’t used footnotes – all the footnotes are worth reading, and would work much better as part of the main text – but that’s a small concern. I’m assuming that the research was thorough. There is one glaring error, but I’m guessing it’s just a slip where he relied on memory and it let him down (I’m always doing this in my books). He attributes the put-down ‘All science is either physics or stamp collecting,’ to Kelvin, where it was actually Rutherford who made this cutting remark.
All in all, though, an excellent book about an era that should be essential knowledge for all of us in the modern world.

Hardback:  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's On You - Nick Chater and George Loewenstein *****

Going on the cover you might think this was a political polemic - and admittedly there's an element of that - but the reason it's so good is quite different. It shows how behavioural economics and social psychology have led us astray by putting the focus way too much on individuals. A particular target is the concept of nudges which (as described in Brainjacking ) have been hugely over-rated. But overall the key problem ties to another psychological concept: framing. Huge kudos to both Nick Chater and George Loewenstein - a behavioural scientist and an economics and psychology professor - for having the guts to take on the flaws in their own earlier work and that of colleagues, because they make clear just how limited and potentially dangerous is the belief that individuals changing their behaviour can solve large-scale problems. The main thesis of the book is that there are two ways to approach the major problems we face - an 'i-frame' where we focus on the individual ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Introducing Artificial Intelligence – Henry Brighton & Howard Selina ****

It is almost impossible to rate these relentlessly hip books – they are pure marmite*. The huge  Introducing  … series (a vast range of books covering everything from Quantum Theory to Islam), previously known as …  for Beginners , puts across the message in a style that owes as much to Terry Gilliam and pop art as it does to popular science. Pretty well every page features large graphics with speech bubbles that are supposed to emphasise the point. Funnily,  Introducing Artificial Intelligence  is both a good and bad example of the series. Let’s get the bad bits out of the way first. The illustrators of these books are very variable, and I didn’t particularly like the pictures here. They did add something – the illustrations in these books always have a lot of information content, rather than being window dressing – but they seemed more detached from the text and rather lacking in the oomph the best versions have. The other real problem is that...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more