Skip to main content

Klara and the Sun (SF) - Kazuo Ishiguro ***

There is always a significant danger when a member of the literari takes on a science fiction theme - the result can easily seem derivative and dull when covering a topic that has already been better explored by others. (Of course the literary fiction audience are unlikely to realise this.) Sadly, there is an element of this danger manifest in Kazuo Ishiguro's new novel.

The theme is a well-trodden one. A robot with strong artificial intelligence faces up to emotions and is used to explore the human condition. Here called 'artificial friends' we can see a progression to such companion robots from the current wave of cuddly robot pets, producing a device that has general artificial intelligence giving it the abilities and emotions of a human being. Klara is both a companion to and a replacement for a dying child.

Of course there is nothing wrong with exploring a well-trodden path if you have something new to say, but most what occurs in Klara and the Sun is anything but original. Most recently we've had Set my Heart to Five, with a robot discovering emotions - but there were plenty of closer parallels to this storyline earlier. One should even be familiar to film fans in the troubled movie AI, started by Kubrick and finished by Spielberg, where a robot child is manufactured for similar reasons to Klara - a story that despite the clunkiness of the film manages still to be moving, and that is done far better in the original Brian Aldiss short story.

Earlier, of course, Isaac Asimov covered robots and society over a wide range of short stories and novels - and it's a topic that has been covered many times since by master in the field. One problem that emerges once comparisons are made is that SF writers tend to know a lot more about the science. General artificial intelligence is nightmarishly complex thing to create, far beyond our current capabilities. To think that this could be done any time soon is itself unlikely. But that Klara would at the same time be totally unworldly and lacking in the abilities that even IBM's Jeopardy-winning computer Watson had to look information up and give it context from online sources is simply ignorant. We know all SF gets it wrong about the future - look at some of the technology in the original series of Star Trek, for instance - but at least it starts from what's known at the time, rather than ignoring science and technology.

I had genuinely hoped to find something new and interesting in Ishiguro's take on the subject, but the core is very much more of the same, with the addition of frankly tedious over-writing. There's a meme doing the rounds of social media headed 'Book Blurbs - glossary of terms' which defines 'Epic' as 'cowed by the author's reputation'. That has clearly happened here in a book that could do with a sweeping edit to clear out the deadwood. 

It's not all bad. But it could have been so much better.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T
Post a Comment
Read more

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book
Post a Comment
Read more

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on
Post a Comment
Read more