Skip to main content

Life After Gravity - Patricia Fara ***

Patricia Fara has a way of making history of science different by looking at what may be a familiar topic from an unexpected angle. In this partial biography of Isaac Newton, dealing with his time in London, she takes this approach with mixed success.

The best thing is that we see more of this time in Newton's life, which tends to be dealt with relatively quickly in standard scientific biographies, as his focus was primarily dealing with the Royal Mint and the Royal Society. That the word 'royal' appears twice here is no coincidence, as we see a picture of a new Newton emerging, getting away from his near-monastic scientific life at Cambridge to become a more social creature, with a distinct interest in keeping in with high society, including the royal family. Perhaps the most interesting thing for me was the way that Fara brings in a topic that I've rarely seen mentioned in Newton biographies - slavery. Newton might not have been actively involved, but the slave trade was pervasively connected to the wealth of the nation and it misses a significant aspect of what shaped his life and wealth (just as does the discussion of Newton's politics).

Unfortunately, for me, the whole didn't work brilliantly. The text felt quite fragmented and rambling, in part because of Fara's framing approach, which is to use a Hogarth painting of children putting on a play in John Conduitt's drawing room as a way of exploring different aspects of Newton's life, even though the painting dates from after Newton's death. The relevance of the painting is partly that a bust of Newton features in it, partly that Conduitt married Newton's niece, who had lived in Newton's London household, and also that Conduitt took on Newton's role as Master of the Mint. (There are also royalty and aristocracy in the painting, reflecting the social climbing.) 

It's true that the painting does reflect some links to aspects of Newton's London life - but still the use of it feels forced, not helped by the atrocious quality of the black and white on-page reproduction of the painting in the book. Such images have improved in quality over the years, but this was so murky you could hardly make out that there were people in it. It wasn't until I got half way through the book and realised that all the on-page images were duplicated in a colour plates section that I could see the painting and even there it was too small (it would have been far better to just have had the plates).

Although it's important to describe those around Newton to give his life context, there seemed too much on other people, either because they're in the painting or were influential in his life - I wanted more Newton. It's also the case that Fara's politics came through quite heavy-handedly, for example in the strange comment that in a largely ungendered English language it's notable that countries are feminine - I've never heard anyone refer to a country as 'she'. Similarly, while the exploration of the relevance of the slave trade to the life of the well-off of the period was one of the best parts of the book, Fara mostly made it seem as if this was all about Europeans capturing Africans to make them slaves, rather than purchasing those who had been enslaved by other Africans: this wasn't a one-sided trade.

Overall, then, there are good elements here, and I welcome attempts to look at creative ways to frame scientific history - but all creativity involves a risk of failure, and for me this one didn't quite come off.

Hardback: 
Bookshop.org

  

Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Review by Brian Clegg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

David Spiegelhalter Five Way interview

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Emeritus Professor of Statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He was previously Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication and has presented the BBC4 documentaries Tails you Win: the Science of Chance, the award-winning Climate Change by Numbers. His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics , was published in March 2019. He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020. His latest book is The Art of Uncertainty . Why probability? because I have been fascinated by the idea of probability, and what it might be, for over 50 years. Why is the ‘P’ word missing from the title? That's a good question.  Partly so as not to make it sound like a technical book, but also because I did not want to give the impression that it was yet another book

The Genetic Book of the Dead: Richard Dawkins ****

When someone came up with the title for this book they were probably thinking deep cultural echoes - I suspect I'm not the only Robert Rankin fan in whom it raised a smile instead, thinking of The Suburban Book of the Dead . That aside, this is a glossy and engaging book showing how physical makeup (phenotype), behaviour and more tell us about the past, with the messenger being (inevitably, this being Richard Dawkins) the genes. Worthy of comment straight away are the illustrations - this is one of the best illustrated science books I've ever come across. Generally illustrations are either an afterthought, or the book is heavily illustrated and the text is really just an accompaniment to the pictures. Here the full colour images tie in directly to the text. They are not asides, but are 'read' with the text by placing them strategically so the picture is directly with the text that refers to it. Many are photographs, though some are effective paintings by Jana Lenzová. T

Everything is Predictable - Tom Chivers *****

There's a stereotype of computer users: Mac users are creative and cool, while PC users are businesslike and unimaginative. Less well-known is that the world of statistics has an equivalent division. Bayesians are the Mac users of the stats world, where frequentists are the PC people. This book sets out to show why Bayesians are not just cool, but also mostly right. Tom Chivers does an excellent job of giving us some historical background, then dives into two key aspects of the use of statistics. These are in science, where the standard approach is frequentist and Bayes only creeps into a few specific applications, such as the accuracy of medical tests, and in decision theory where Bayes is dominant. If this all sounds very dry and unexciting, it's quite the reverse. I admit, I love probability and statistics, and I am something of a closet Bayesian*), but Chivers' light and entertaining style means that what could have been the mathematical equivalent of debating angels on