Skip to main content

Project Hail Mary - Andy Weir *****

‘Pretty much the perfect science fiction novel’ – that’s how I described Andy Weir’s first book, The Martian, when I reviewed it on this site a few years ago. But now that I’ve read this latest offering from him, I’ll have to revise my definition of perfection. Weir has simply excelled himself in every way. Project Hail Mary is even stronger on ‘real’ science than The Martian was, and its high-stakes plot is even more exciting and cleverly constructed.

The book does, however, pose something of a problem for the reviewer. The way the story unfolds makes it extremely difficult to write a meaningful review that’s totally spoiler-free. Strictly speaking, I can’t even tell you its setting or the protagonist’s name, or the rationale behind the ‘project’ of the novel’s title, because they only emerge as the story progresses. But even the publisher gives these things away in their publicity material, so I will too. Rest assured there are plenty of twists and surprises that I won’t even hint at.

The whole novel is narrated in the first person by a schoolteacher, and former astrobiology researcher, named Ryland Grace. He’s on a spaceship heading for another star system, although he doesn’t know that at first. He’s suffering from amnesia, and his memory only comes back bit by bit in the form of sudden flashbacks – which, of course, are just as useful to the reader as they are to him. It turns out he’s on a do-or-die mission to single-handedly save humanity from certain extinction. If that sounds like a terrible cliché, Weir redeems it through elegant plotting and robustly thought-through science. Everything – the nature of the threat to Earth and the potential solution to it, the space drive that powers the ship almost to the speed of light, even Grace’s own memory loss – gets tied together with impeccable logic.

Making the protagonist a schoolteacher is a stroke of brilliance. The ‘boring’ high-school physics of force, mass, acceleration and momentum rarely gets a mention in sci-fi, but it’s critically important to almost everything that happens in space. Weir knows this, and he illustrates it repeatedly throughout the book. More importantly, he shows how an understanding of such things, and an ability to do rough mental calculations around them, can solve real-world practical problems. From time dilation and the conservation of angular momentum to Fourier analysis and the relationship of wavelength to temperature, the science in this book is real, and Weir’s protagonist uses it in exactly the way a real scientist – or science teacher – would.

In my review of The Martian, I mentioned that it had ‘an engaging cast of characters’. Project Hail Mary isn’t quite the same. Many of the characters appearing in the flashback scenes have a distinctly one-dimensional, almost cartoony feel. But that’s not bad writing, it’s clever writing. Remember that we’re seeing everyone filtered through Ryland Grace’s perceptions. I suspect that, in stressful work situations, we really do tend to see our colleagues and bosses in exaggerated cartoony terms. On the other hand, Grace himself is an incredibly well-drawn personality (and the novel has one other great character too, but that really would be a spoiler).

I loved this book for largely personal reasons, because of its realistic portrayal of science and the way scientists think and work, which are peculiar passions of mine. So I was always going to give it five stars. But when I logged into Goodreads I discovered I wasn’t the only one – it currently has an average of 4.52 stars from almost 260,000 user ratings. It took an awful lot of 5-star reviews to push the average that high, so it looks like you don’t have to be a science nerd to enjoy Project Hail Mary after all.


Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Andrew May

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...