Skip to main content

Michael Banks - Five Way Interview

Michael Banks is a science writer and author and is currently news editor of Physics World magazine. As well as Physics World, he has written for Nature, BBC Focus and Science Uncovered as well as appeared on BBC Radio 4 and at science festivals. His first book The Secret Science of Baby was published in 2022 and his new book is Physics Around the Clock.

Why science?

I only became really interested in science when I was around 15 years old - and to be honest I don’t really know why I preferred physics over the other sciences. I think I saw it as a challenge given the perception that the subject is difficult. But the more I studied physics, the more fascinating it became. I then chose to study physics at university and that’s when I became really hooked.

I found it particularly captivating how mathematics could be used to describe and understand the natural world. It could not only describe various phenomenon but also be used to predict things that then subsequently went on to be discovered – I found that concept mind blowing.

Why this book?

I’ve always been interested in science that is relatable to everyday life. It’s one reason why I wrote my first book – The Secret Science of Baby – which is all about the surprising physics you encounter during pregnancy, childbirth and even babyhood itself. 

Physics Around the Clock looks at the science you might unknowingly come across during the day, whether that is when making a coffee, taking the dog out for a walk or when pottering around in the garden. With this book I really wanted to get across that physics isn’t just an abstract subject about subatomic particles or cosmic black holes but is something that is all around us and relevant to most things we do day in, day out. 

What I really hope is that readers get a fresh perspective on everyday situations and look at these occurrences in a completely different light – even a falling water droplet from a dripping tap in the bath is full of rich and interesting physics. 

I was surprised by the electrical clumping of coffee grinding - was there anything that took you by surprise when researching these items?

Yes, the clumping of coffee grounds that occurs during grinding is interesting, not only because it happens in the first place but also as it affects how much coffee is extracted from the ground beans. Adding a drop of water can stop it from happening and also produce a more consistent and better brew. 

Another aspect I found interesting was the ejection of liquid droplets when flushing a toilet. All that chaotic motion in the cistern results in small particles shooting out, reaching face height within seconds. Such droplets were found to travel many meters in the air and in the process potentially distribute pathogens across the room – onto floors, walls and even the ceiling. 

Now you might think ah, simple, just close the lid before flushing, but research has found this isn’t the case. In fact, it can result in more stuff spreading onto the floor and walls. It’s certainly made me ponder bathroom cleanliness – and perhaps think about placing your toothbrush far away from the toilet, or better still, hide it away in a cupboard!  

What’s next?

On the immediate horizon, I have a public talk in London on 29 October at the Institute of Physics where I will be discussing the book. Longer term, Physics Around the Clock will be published in the US in April 2026 and there will also be Chinese translations – both traditional and simplified Chinese - later that year.

What’s exciting you at the moment? 

I have an idea for another physics-based popular-science book, which I think would be really interesting and fun to research and write. At the moment, it only exists in my head, but I am slowly starting to think about how to approach it, so watch this space!

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanotechnology - Rahul Rao ****

There was a time when nanotechnology was both going to transform the world and wipe us out - a similar position to our view of AI today. On the positive transformation side there was K. Eric Drexler's visions in the 1986 Engines of Creation. Arguably as much science fiction as engineering possibilities, it predicted the ability to use vast armies of assemblers to put objects together from individual atoms.  On the negative side was the vision of grey goo, out of control nanotechnology consuming all in its path as it made more and more copies of itself. In 2003, for instance, the then Prince Charles made the headlines  when newspapers reported ‘The prince has raised the spectre of the “grey goo” catastrophe in which sub-microscopic machines designed to share intelligence and replicate themselves take over and devour the planet.’ These days the expectations have been eased down a notch or two. Where nanotechnology has succeeded, it has been with the likes of atom-thick mat...
Post a Comment
Read more