Skip to main content

Entropy - James Binney ****

Most people are familiar with energy, both in its everyday sense as a resource used for things like heating and powering electrical equipment, and – if they were paying attention in school – as a fundamental property of the physical world that can be converted from one form into another, but never created or destroyed. Entropy, the subject of this book, is a similar but much less well known fundamental physical property. As James Binney says in the first chapter, ‘most people without a degree in physics or chemistry will not have heard of entropy, and probably few of those with relevant degrees could explain what entropy is with any clarity’.

It’s true that entropy is one of the more difficult concepts in physics, at least as regards its precise scientific meaning. At an intuitive level, however, even people who have never heard the word are probably aware of it. If you’ve ever had a sneaking suspicion that energy might not actually be conserved in the way science teachers say it is – because in your experience things are always running down and wearing out – then that’s a consequence of entropy. In simple terms, it can be thought of as a measure of how much ‘useless’ energy there is in a closed system, in the sense of energy that can’t be exploited to any practical purpose. And entropy, unlike energy, isn’t conserved – it can increase, but it can never decrease. If conservation of energy is the good news, then entropy is the bad news. As Binney points out more than once in the book, energy is free – it’s in abundant supply all around us. What costs money, and causes so many headaches for politicians and the public alike, is low-entropy energy that can actually be used for something.

Rewinding to the end of the first paragraph, you may spot something a little odd. If James Binney knows there are so few people that have even heard of entropy, why has he used it as a single-word title of this book? The answer is quite simple: it’s part of OUP’s long-running ‘Very Short Introduction’ series, which operates within well-established constraints – one of these being that the title is always a straight description of the subject matter. As to the style of the books themselves, they are indeed short – this one is only a little over a hundred small pages – and they are ‘introductions’, in the sense of assuming the reader starts with zero knowledge of the subject. As a rule, though, they’re aimed at serious readers who need a quick but thorough-going crash course – whether that’s to pass an exam or for a work-related project – rather than general readers looking for a few entertaining and memorable highlights. In the context of a science subject like this one, the result isn’t really what you would understand by the term ‘popular science’, and was never meant to be.

As regards this specific book, casual readers will find it bombards them with far more technical detail than they wanted to know about the mathematical definitions of entropy, its relationship to other areas of physics, and the way that scientists and engineers use it in their everyday work. Even so, there are some fascinating insights, particularly on the historical development of the subject – with various eminent scientists spending several decades of the nineteenth century trying to unscramble their understanding of energy and entropy – as well as its relationship to cutting-edge areas of modern physics such as quantum entanglement and black holes. There are also a few interesting examples – though not as many as I would have liked – of what might be called ‘everyday’ applications of entropy, for example in heat pumps and image processing.

The very title of this book, and the fact that it’s part of this particular OUP series, means that in practice anyone who buys it will have a pretty good idea what they’re letting themselves in for. It’s these readers that my 4-star rating is aimed at. On the other hand, if it happened to come into the hands of a more general popular science reader, they’re likely to find far more technical detail than they are used to. If they’re happy to skip over this, however, they’ll still find plenty of interesting things that aren’t widely covered elsewhere.

Paperback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:
Review by Andrew May - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...