Review: Galactic North (SF) - Alastair Reynolds ****

Publishing lore has it that collections of short stories don't sell - yet shorter writing often works wonderfully in science fiction and has been a major contributor to SF history. I (like, I suspect, other SF enthusiasts) would like to see many more such books. This one is diving into the past (2006), but if you have read any books set in Alastair Reynolds' Revelation Space universe (which includes the Prefect Dreyfus novels) it does a brilliant job of filling in some gaps (past and future) of that massive world building exercise.

As a collection it's unusual both in that all eight of its contents fit in that same setting, and that it mostly comprises novellas and long stories, ranging in length from 17 to 67 pages. I personally prefer more shorts and greater variety, but the way that it gives context for the novels is impressive.

Three of the stories are arguably SF horror - picking up on a recurring theme of the impact of the future ability of science to modify humans that runs through most of collection, whether through additions to the brain or biological modifications to deal with different environments. I was least impressed by the title story, in that it's one of those efforts that spans many thousands of years, in this case to illustrate the outcome of a major technological mistake that is effectively destroying animal life in the galaxy. The underlying plot in this one seems strangely weak for Reynolds.

However, the rest all work well and take us into what it is to be human in a way that pretentious literary fiction is supposed to but rarely does. Well worth a look if, like me, you missed it when it came out.

Paperback:

Kindle:
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee:
Review by Brian Clegg - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life. To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier. It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...

Search This Blog