Skip to main content

Interstellar Tours - Brian Clegg ****

New books about astronomy, aimed at general readers, are coming out all the time. The most obvious reason for this is that it’s a subject that never stands still, and even a book written five years ago can look dated to anyone who keeps up with the latest theories and discoveries. While authors are scarcely likely to complain about the ongoing demand for new books, they may struggle to find a sufficiently fresh angle to make their latest contribution stand out from its predecessors. Yet that’s what Brian Clegg has done brilliantly well in Interstellar Tours, which presents what might have been a pretty standard account of the make-up of our galaxy from a strikingly different perspective.

Clegg asks us to imagine we are 22nd-century tourists taking a short cruise around the galaxy on a starship that’s capable of jumping, more or less instantaneously, to any point within a 100,000-light-year sphere centred on the Earth. This much is science fiction, because there’s no way it could be made to happen within the currently known laws of physics. Beyond that, however, the book is almost entirely non-fiction. There are no intelligent aliens in Clegg’s galaxy (though he doesn’t rule out the possibility they may eventually be found), but there are very simple life-forms in the subsurface oceans of Jupiter’s moon Europa. While we don’t know this for a fact today, it isn’t pure science fiction either. It’s more in the line of ‘informed speculation’ – something that many present-day scientists believe might soon turn out be true. When he touches on possible future developments like this, either in the context of scientific knowledge or technology, Clegg highlights them with short text boxes headed ‘speculation alert’.

Like any real sightseeing cruise, the book doesn’t try to describe everything it might encounter along the way – just a few key destinations that are especially interesting or engaging for tourists from Earth. This includes the planets of our own solar system as well as a selection of ‘exoplanets’ orbiting other stars, and a handful of truly spectacular sights including star-forming regions, supernovas and pulsars. But the most extensive coverage (around 60 pages spanning 2 chapters) goes to black holes – which, after all, are going to be near the top of anyone’s galactic sightseeing list.

To be honest, talking about ‘sights’ is probably underselling what the book actually offers. At one point Clegg makes a useful distinction between the fields of astronomy and astrophysics: ‘Broadly, astronomers collect facts, while astrophysicists try to explain those facts using physical theory.’ By this definition, the book probably leans more to astrophysics than astronomy. It does describe what the starship travellers would see – from much closer range than any present-day telescope –  but this is just a starting-point for an explanation of the underlying science.

Not everyone would willingly pick up a book about astrophysics (a subject with a thoroughly undeserved reputation for dryness and obscurity), so Clegg’s trick of turning it into a sci-fi-sounding space voyage is a clever one. Even so, there are downsides to it as well. One of Clegg’s great strengths as a popular science writer is that he understands his readers very well, and has a pleasantly chatty way of talking directly to them – the real Brian Clegg addressing the real you. But he can’t do that here, because the narrative is ostensibly a 22nd-century tour guide talking to 22nd-century tourists. This means, for example, that explaining complex ideas by drawing analogies with the familiar 21st century world around us, as Clegg might do in any of his other books, isn’t an option in this case.

The other small problem I had with the book may only be an issue for people like me, who habitually overthink such things. But it has to do with those ‘speculation alert’ boxes. Given that so many things are likely to change in the next hundred-odd years, why are some things speculated on, while others (such as the future of NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope, to mention an obvious one that occurred to me) aren’t? At one extreme – invoking some kind of fictitious ‘prime directive’ that prevents us knowing anything about our own future, for example – there could have been no speculation boxes at all. That would certainly have been preferable to the other extreme, where the boxes took over the book to the extent that it was more about potential future developments than our current picture of the cosmos. But Clegg’s actual approach lies somewhere between these two extremes.

To me, this gave the book a distinctly split feel – as if it were trying very hard to be purely factual, but couldn’t help being pulled towards speculation every now and then. This isn’t really a criticism, though, as I agreed with the majority of Clegg’s speculations and found some of them positively amusing – such as when he sweeps aside all the currently fashionable theories of dark matter and quantum gravity. On the other hand, scientists working in those particular fields may be less amused – as would all those space agencies aiming to have human bases on Mars by the end of the 2030s, when they’re told this will have to wait until the 2060s. That’s still a little optimistic in my opinion – but then again, if human spaceflight were shown as progressing at the pace it really does, we’d never be able to go on our interstellar cruise in the 22nd century, would we?

Despite the occasional excursions into speculation, Clegg always clearly labels them as such, which puts his book head and shoulders above an earlier one I reviewed that was based on a similar concept (albeit limited to the Solar System) – The Ultimate Interplanetary Travel Guide by Jim Bell. Having just looked back at Bell’s book, I’m afraid my review of it was a little too harsh (I should have give it three stars, not two), but my central criticism that he makes no distinction between facts and speculation still stands. So that’s a major plus for Clegg’s book. If there’s one area in which Bell’s book wins hands down, though, it’s in visual content – it’s packed full of eyecatching colour images. Arguably Clegg has these, too – but they’re on an associated website rather than embedded in the book itself. If you’re reading it electronically this means you constantly have to click on hyperlinks, or if you go for the print version you have to use QR codes, which is even more distracting. But never mind – it’s just a small irritation in what’s an otherwise really gripping tour of the galaxy around us.

Hardback:   
Kindle 
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Andrew May - See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here
Please note, this title is written by the editor of the Popular Science website. Our review is still an honest opinion – and we could hardly omit the book – but do want to make the connection clear.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, BollorĂ© and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...