Skip to main content

Beyond the Burn Line (SF) - Paul McAuley ****

I have only previously read two of Paul McAuley's science fiction novels, Fairyland and Austral, both impressive, interesting and different. The same is also true of Beyond the Burn Line, making me realise I need to dig into his back catalogue for the future.

Beyond the Burn Line is a book of two halves. The first takes us into a far future Earth, where the dominant species, simply referred to as 'people' but clearly not human, live a relatively low tech, but rich life. We discover that they used to be slaves of intelligent bears, who were the main intelligent species on Earth for thousands of years before their relatively recent demise. Humans (referred to as ogres) have been extinct far longer, which, until things are explained further, made the tag line of the book 'What will become of us?' confusing.

This first half of the book is a distinctly slow-paced adventure, involving the troubles of the secretary of a notable scholar who has just died: as a result of his punishment, the former secretary discovers a fascinating relic that sends him on a quest, trying to prove the existence of visitors from the skies. Whether or not intentionally, what McAuley has produced here is the SF equivalent of the hobbits in Tolkien's fantasies - McAuley's 'people' are small, hairy, a touch pompous, with a tendency to teeter on the borderline between being loveable and being twee. Their not-quite-human nature makes it a little harder to truly sympathise with the main character, but the reader is kept onside by the storyline.

The second half is an abrupt transition from the first. The 'people' still feature, but we now find out exactly what they are and how they came to exist. This section is not told from their viewpoint, but it would give away too much to say why and how this is the case. Most of this half worked significantly better for me in terms of characterisation, while the pace picks up significantly. Much of the mystery of the earlier part of the book is now explained.

So far, so good, but there remain some problems. Practically every character in the second half seems to have an ulterior motive, and the main character's actions are repeatedly derailed to an extent that becomes a touch tedious. It is also confusing in places as many characters are introduced briefly, and it becomes difficult to remember who is who amongst the various adversaries and apparent helpers in the repeatedly shifting perspective of the apparent truth. Add in a distinctly frustrating ending, and the reader can emerge a little unsettled.

Despite this, though, the ideas are original and far-thinking. There are (slightly heavy-handed) messages about colonisation and the treatment of indigenous people - though perhaps there is not enough exploration of what being indigenous really means under the circumstances of the novel's storyline. I'm very glad I read this book - and, as mentioned, I will search out more McAuley - but I still wish the second half wasn't both confusing and endowed with a rushed feeling as it reaches the ending.

Hardback:   
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg - See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Infinite Alphabet - Cesar Hidalgo ****

Although taking a very new approach, this book by a physicist working in economics made me nostalgic for the business books of the 1980s. More on why in a moment, but Cesar Hidalgo sets out to explain how it is knowledge - how it is developed, how it is managed and forgotten - that makes the difference between success and failure. When I worked for a corporate in the 1980s I was very taken with Tom Peters' business books such of In Search of Excellence (with Robert Waterman), which described what made it possible for some companies to thrive and become huge while others failed. (It's interesting to look back to see a balance amongst the companies Peters thought were excellent, with successes such as Walmart and Intel, and failures such as Wang and Kodak.) In a similar way, Hidalgo uses case studies of successes and failures for both businesses and countries in making effective use of knowledge to drive economic success. When I read a Tom Peters book I was inspired and fired up...
Post a Comment
Read more

God: the Science, the Evidence - Michel-Yves Bolloré and Olivier Bonnassies ***

This is, to say the least, an oddity, but a fascinating one. A translation of a French bestseller, it aims to put forward an examination of the scientific evidence for the existence of a deity… and various other things, as this is a very oddly structured book (more on that in a moment). In The God Delusion , Richard Dawkins suggested that we should treat the existence of God as a scientific claim, which is exactly what the authors do reasonably well in the main part of the book. They argue that three pieces of scientific evidence in particular are supportive of the existence of a (generic) creator of the universe. These are that the universe had a beginning, the fine tuning of natural constants and the unlikeliness of life.  To support their evidence, Bolloré and Bonnassies give a reasonable introduction to thermodynamics and cosmology. They suggest that the expected heat death of the universe implies a beginning (for good thermodynamic reasons), and rightly give the impression tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Science - Lawrence Krauss (Ed.) ****

At first glance this might appear to be yet another book on how to deal with climate change deniers and the like, such as How to Talk to a Science Denier.   It is, however, a much more significant book because it addresses the way that universities, government and pressure groups have attempted to undermine the scientific process. Conceptually I would give it five stars, but it's quite heavy going because it's a collection of around 18 essays by different academics, with many going over the same ground, so there is a lot of repetition. Even so, it's an important book. There are a few well-known names here - editor Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker - but also a range of scientists (with a few philosophers) explaining how science is being damaged in academia by unscientific ideas. Many of the issues apply to other disciplines as well, but this is specifically about the impact on science, and particularly important there because of the damage it has been doing...
Post a Comment
Read more