Skip to main content

Erasmus Darwin - Patricia Fara *****

Patricia Fara has written a number of accessible history of science titles in the past, for example Science: a four thousand year history and Sex, Botany and Empire - but they have been conventional, if readable, academic titles. In her book on Erasmus Darwin (finally making it into paperback after eight years), she subverts the genre, along the way making it the most enjoyable relatively heavy-duty history of science book I've ever read.

 Fara claims in her introduction that her approach was inspired by reading Lolita on a train: one of Humbert Humbert's thoughts inspired her to ponder the nature of history and how the process of uncovering what happened in the past differs from the straight line narrative we usually read. As a result, Fara draws us into the unstructured process of discovery, where new, sometimes serendipitous, findings can send the writer off on a whole new tack.  (I say 'claims in her introduction' not in a negative way, but because Fara does warn 'in this book about Darwin, my [fictionalized] personal narratives are not necessarily completely true.')

 The subject of the book is Erasmus Darwin, grandfather of the somewhat better-known Charles, best remembered for his long poems on biology and nature - distinctly impenetrable to modern eyes - and as a member of the famous Lunar Society that brought together Midlands natural philosophy enthusiasts at the end of the eighteenth century. Although the book does have some biographical content, the focus is Darwin's writings and particularly on a mocking spoof of his work called The Loves of Triangles, which shifts the focus of Darwin's The Loves of Plants onto mathematical shapes in what is primarily an attack on his politics and to a degree religious beliefs. Along the way, we discover that Darwin was more than a medic who dabbled in biology and slightly prefigured evolutionary theory: there is a strong political thread in his work, including a focus on the abolition of slavery, along with enthusiasm for industry and for sexual themes (with the inevitable modesty of the day).

 I confess that as a science writer myself, I am probably an ideal audience for this book. I identify totally with the way that discoveries made during the research and writing can shift the direction of a book as it is written, and require the author to suddenly plunge into a new topic in a way that's delightful for her or him to experience. And there's something refreshingly honest about Fara's admission of struggling with Darwin's stodgy, drawn-out poetical style - something anyone addressing many Victorian novels we are supposed to find wonderful may also have experienced.

 If I have a criticism, it's that there isn't enough of this meta-text in the book. Fara sets out to produce a very different form of history of science title - and succeeds - but perhaps too high a percentage of the content has a conventional form and ends up exposing us to repeated exposition of Darwin's principle themes and stodgy versification. However, this doesn't undermine the fact that this is a wonderful way to make the process of exploring the history of science come alive. 

 This study of Darwin through his didactic poetry uses the approach on a small and relatively insignificant corner of scientific history - I would love to see the same approach, made even more bold and personal, applied to some of the big picture aspects of the subject. For now, though, this was an impressive step forward in a field not always famous for its innovation.

Paperback:     
Kindle:  
Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you
Review by Brian Clegg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Laws of Thought - Tom Griffiths *****

In giving us a history of attempts to explain our thinking abilities, Tom Griffiths demonstrates an excellent ability to pitch information just right for the informed general reader.  We begin with Aristotelian logic and the way Boole and others transformed it into a kind of arithmetic before a first introduction of computing and theories of language. Griffiths covers a surprising amount of ground - we don't just get, for instance, the obvious figures of Turing, von Neumann and Shannon, but the interaction between the computing pioneers and those concerned with trying to understand the way we think - for example in the work of Jerome Bruner, of whom I confess I'd never heard.  This would prove to be the case with a whole host of people who have made interesting contributions to the understanding of human thought processes. Sometimes their theories were contradictory - this isn't an easy field to successfully observe - but always they were interesting. But for me, at least, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Einstein's Fridge - Paul Sen ****

In Einstein's Fridge (interesting factoid: this is at least the third popular science book to be named after Einstein's not particularly exciting refrigerator), Paul Sen has taken on a scary challenge. As Jim Al-Khalili made clear in his excellent The World According to Physics , our physical understanding of reality rests on three pillars: relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics. But there is no doubt that the third of these, the topic of Sen's book, is a hard sell. While it's true that these are the three pillars of physics, from the point of view of making interesting popular science, the first two might be considered pillars of gold and platinum, while the third is a pillar of salt. Relativity and quantum theory are very much of the twentieth century. They are exciting and sometimes downright weird and wonderful. Thermodynamics, by contrast, has a very Victorian feel and, well, is uninspiring. Luckily, though, thermodynamics is important enough, lying behind ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanotechnology - Rahul Rao ****

There was a time when nanotechnology was both going to transform the world and wipe us out - a similar position to our view of AI today. On the positive transformation side there was K. Eric Drexler's visions in the 1986 Engines of Creation. Arguably as much science fiction as engineering possibilities, it predicted the ability to use vast armies of assemblers to put objects together from individual atoms.  On the negative side was the vision of grey goo, out of control nanotechnology consuming all in its path as it made more and more copies of itself. In 2003, for instance, the then Prince Charles made the headlines  when newspapers reported ‘The prince has raised the spectre of the “grey goo” catastrophe in which sub-microscopic machines designed to share intelligence and replicate themselves take over and devour the planet.’ These days the expectations have been eased down a notch or two. Where nanotechnology has succeeded, it has been with the likes of atom-thick mat...
Post a Comment
Read more