Skip to main content

Stephen James O'Meara - Four Way Interview

Stephen James O’Meara is an award-winning astronomer and author/co-author of more than a dozen books, including the third edition of Oxford’s A Dictionary of Space Exploration (2018). He is a columnist and editor for Astronomy magazine, and former associate editor of GeminiFocus and Sky & Telescope magazines. Asteroid 3637 is named O’Meara in his honour. His latest book is Mars.

Why science?

Science is the key to understanding mysteries. I grew up during the golden age of science fiction and space exploration, when questions initially outweighed answers. 

What comes especially to mind from that era was the first episode of the 1963 TV programme, The Outer Limits, called The Galaxy Being. In it, a peaceful being from the Andromeda Galaxy is accidentally brought to Earth via radio transmission. The military tries to destroy the Being but fails. In response, the Galaxy Being simply tells the earthlings to stop using force, reminding them that there are powers in the Universe beyond anything they know. He then tells them, 'There is much you have to learn. You must explore. You must reach out. Go to your homes. Go and give thought to the mysteries of the Universe.' And that’s what I did, and have done ever since I saw that program at the age of six. The point is we fear what we don’t understand. We need science to alleviate those fears.

Why this book?

Mars has fascinated me since childhood when I began observing it with a 60-mm refractor from my back porch in the 1960s, followed by seeing the 1971 global dust storm at the age of 14 through the 9-inch Alvan Clark refractor at Harvard College Observatory — and  shown to me by the dust storm’s discoverer Dennis Milon. This global storm was the one that largely obscured the planet from the Mariner 9 spacecraft’s view when the craft achieved orbit around Mars on November 14th of that year, just two days before my 15th birthday. Admittedly, I was fascinated by the lore of the Red Planet — as presented by Lowell with his canals, and as depicted in science fiction (especially from the pages of Edgar Rice Burroughs). To me, Mars was a planet alive with mysteries. Little has changed in that respect. Did Mars have water in the past? Does Mars have water today? Did life (microbial) once exist on the Red Planet? Does life still exist on the Red Planet today?  What happened to Mars’s atmosphere? Is Mars habitable? Are humans capable of colonising Mars? No other planet has captured human imagination the way Mars has, and I believe this book is simply a tribute to the ongoing investigation of a planet that was once seen as a mirror of the Earth — and to the imagination of a child who dared to wonder about that world and who continues to do so today.

What’s next?

I’ve always been fascinated with the visible phenomena of the daytime and twilight skies — it’s a part of the visible Universe that largely goes unnoticed. Yet each day offers us the possibility of seeing visual phenomena that capture the ever-changing mood of Earth’s ocean of air and the way light plays with it, or the way the human eye perceives it: the green flash, prismatic ice crystal displays, volcanic twilights, atmospheric glories and so much more. All these phenomena bring us closer to understanding the planet on which we live.  

What’s exciting you at the moment?

You mean aside from from life, nature, and the visible universe? I suppose I’m really looking forward to the upcoming missions to Mars, which should continue to unravel the mysteries surrounding what could potentially be humanity’s next home.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roger Highfield - Stephen Hawking: genius at work interview

Roger Highfield OBE is the Science Director of the Science Museum Group. Roger has visiting professorships at the Department of Chemistry, UCL, and at the Dunn School, University of Oxford, is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, and a member of the Medical Research Council and Longitude Committee. He has written or co-authored ten popular science books, including two bestsellers. His latest title is Stephen Hawking: genius at work . Why science? There are three answers to this question, depending on context: Apollo; Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, along with the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl; and, finally, Nullius in verba . Growing up I enjoyed the sciencey side of TV programmes like Thunderbirds and The Avengers but became completely besotted when, in short trousers, I gazed up at the moon knowing that two astronauts had paid it a visit. As the Apollo programme unfolded, I became utterly obsessed. Today, more than half a century later, the moon landings are
Post a Comment
Read more

Space Oddities - Harry Cliff *****

In this delightfully readable book, Harry Cliff takes us into the anomalies that are starting to make areas of physics seems to be nearing a paradigm shift, just as occurred in the past with relativity and quantum theory. We start with, we are introduced to some past anomalies linked to changes in viewpoint, such as the precession of Mercury (explained by general relativity, though originally blamed on an undiscovered planet near the Sun), and then move on to a few examples of apparent discoveries being wrong: the BICEP2 evidence for inflation (where the result was caused by dust, not the polarisation being studied),  the disappearance of an interesting blip in LHC results, and an apparent mistake in the manipulation of numbers that resulted in alleged discovery of dark matter particles. These are used to explain how statistics plays a part, and the significance of sigmas . We go on to explore a range of anomalies in particle physics and cosmology that may indicate either a breakdown i
Post a Comment
Read more

Splinters of Infinity - Mark Wolverton ****

Many of us who read popular science regularly will be aware of the 'great debate' between American astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis in 1920 over whether the universe was a single galaxy or many. Less familiar is the clash in the 1930s between American Nobel Prize winners Robert Millikan and Arthur Compton over the nature of cosmic rays. This not a book about the nature of cosmic rays as we now understand them, but rather explores this confrontation between heavyweight scientists. Millikan was the first in the fray, and often wrongly named in the press as discoverer of cosmic rays. He believed that this high energy radiation from above was made up of photons that ionised atoms in the atmosphere. One of the reasons he was determined that they should be photons was that this fitted with his thesis that the universe was in a constant state of creation: these photons, he thought, were produced in the birth of new atoms. This view seems to have been primarily driven by re
Post a Comment
Read more